A “Free” CBD Sample Turned Into $200 Million in Charges Consumers Never Approved

An ad for a “free” CBD or keto-related personal care product asks only for a small shipping fee. According to the Federal Trade Commission, that fee was just the entry point into a network of shell companies that went on to bill consumers repeatedly for products they never agreed to purchase, debiting bank accounts without authorization on a scale that took in more than $200 million from consumers nationwide.DOCUMENTED

The FTC sued Legion Media, LLC, KP Commerce, LLC, Pinnacle Payments, LLC, Sloan Health Products, LLC, and their principals in July 2024. Settlements approved that September required the defendants to forfeit assets valued at approximately $40 million and permanently banned them from the underlying conduct.DOCUMENTED

What the complaint alleges

According to the FTC's July 2024 complaint, the Legion Media defendants operated two distinct types of unauthorized billing scams. In the first, consumers who purchased CBD and keto-related products were charged more than the advertised price and enrolled, without their consent, in continuity plans that billed them repeatedly for products they never intended to buy on an ongoing basis.DOCUMENTED In the second, several of the same defendants offered consumers a supposedly free “gift” in exchange for only a small shipping fee, but once consumers provided their card information to pay that fee, they began incurring recurring, unauthorized charges entirely separate from the shipping cost they had agreed to.DOCUMENTED

The role of shell entities in the scheme

The complaint alleges the Legion Media defendants engaged in what the FTC characterized as business impersonation and credit card laundering, using a network of shell entities to process unauthorized online charges in a manner designed to obscure the true source and scale of the billing from both consumers and payment processors.DOCUMENTED Sloan Health Products allegedly played a distinct supporting role, shipping the deceptively marketed products and handling customer returns while sharing in the scheme's profits, all without disclosing information that would reveal its actual connection to the broader operation.DOCUMENTED Dividing a single scheme's functions — marketing, billing, fulfillment, and returns — across separately named entities is a structural tactic that can make it harder for any one payment processor or regulator to see the full scope of the underlying operation from their limited vantage point alone.REVIEWED

Why the case invoked three separate federal statutes

The complaint charged violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act, and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, reflecting the multiple distinct legal theories the underlying conduct implicated: general deception under the FTC Act, negative-option billing violations under ROSCA, and unauthorized electronic debiting of consumer bank accounts under the EFTA.REVIEWED That combination of statutes gave the agency several independent legal bases to challenge the same underlying conduct, since the scheme touched both credit card billing and direct bank account debits, each governed by a different federal consumer protection statute.

Terms of the settlement

The court-approved orders permanently ban all defendants from marketing or selling any product or service using a negative option feature, and separately prohibit them from marketing or selling any product using a “forced upsell” — including through pre-checked boxes or bundled products with no way for a consumer to opt out.DOCUMENTED The orders also prohibit the defendants from failing to disclose material facts about costs, charges, refund and cancellation policies, endorsements, and free trial offers going forward.DOCUMENTED The defendants were required to forfeit assets valued at approximately $40 million, funds the FTC has used to return more than $27.6 million to affected consumers as of its most recent distribution.DOCUMENTED

A shipping fee for a supposedly free gift was, according to the complaint, the entry point into a billing scheme that ultimately took in more than $200 million from consumers nationwide.

Why the case matters

For consumers who see an ad offering a free product in exchange for only a small shipping charge, the Legion Media case is a reminder that this specific offer structure has repeatedly served as an entry point for unauthorized recurring billing schemes, since providing card information for even a nominal charge gives the seller everything needed to initiate further charges the consumer never separately authorized. Checking bank and card statements closely in the weeks after accepting any “free plus shipping” offer remains one of the more reliable ways to catch this pattern before it compounds into hundreds of dollars in unauthorized charges.

Why negative option and forced upsell bans travel together

The settlement's combined prohibition on negative option billing and forced upsell tactics, including pre-checked boxes and bundled products with no opt-out, reflects how these two practices frequently function together in schemes of this kind: a forced upsell adds an unwanted product to a transaction at the point of sale, while a negative option feature then converts that single unwanted addition into a recurring monthly charge the consumer must actively work to stop. Addressing only one of the two practices would have left the other available as a substitute mechanism for generating the same kind of unauthorized billing.

What the multi-year refund timeline shows

The gap between the July 2024 complaint, the September 2024 settlement, and the December 2025 distribution of $27.6 million in refunds reflects the time required to convert forfeited shell-company assets into cash and identify the specific consumers eligible for a share of that recovery. Even a comparatively fast-moving case by FTC standards still took roughly a year and a half from initial complaint to substantial consumer redress reaching affected bank accounts.

Have documents relevant to this story? Reach us through our tips channel.