The Reviews Were Written by the Boss's Relatives
A finalized FTC order against Publishing.com describes wealth claims from founders, reviews from undisclosed insiders, and a hard-to-complete refund process.
Watchdog Journal investigates wrongdoing by individuals, corporations, and institutions — fraud, deception, and misconduct wherever public trust is on the line. Every investigation is built from primary documents: court filings, corporate registries, financial disclosures, archived pages, on-the-record statements. Every claim is weighed against our evidence standard before it's published — nothing runs on trust alone.
A finalized FTC order against Publishing.com describes wealth claims from founders, reviews from undisclosed insiders, and a hard-to-complete refund process.
A 20-jurisdiction settlement details how a vehicle-donation operator kept most of what it raised in the name of breast cancer screening for itself.
The SEC's case against ADM describes how executives allegedly moved profit between company divisions to hit growth numbers promised to investors.
Police say a single network manufactured and sold up to a million forged degree certificates — exposing how little credentials are actually verified.
The second edition of our running enforcement record: an AI-branded crypto scam, an MLM earnings ban, and a record health care fraud takedown.
The FTC has begun enforcing its Consumer Review Rule — warning letters to ten companies and a widening probe into fake, AI-generated reviews online.
Every material claim in a Watchdog Journal investigation is classified by the strength of the evidence behind it — assigned by the record, not by how confident we feel. Readers see the classification in the text, next to the claim it applies to.
Supported by primary-source records: court filings, registries, archived pages, on-the-record statements. The only claims we state as fact.
Assessed by our reporters, with the supporting evidence characterized in the text. Patterns are reported as patterns, never upgraded to fact.
Claimed by a subject about themselves and not independently verified. Always attributed, never adopted.
Contradicted by the documentary record — with both the claim and the contradicting evidence presented.
Accountability journalism only works if the newsroom itself can be held to account. These are the rules we operate under, in full, with no exceptions.
No advertising, no donations, no payment for coverage, and no payment for the removal of coverage. Nobody buys their way in — or out.
Where a subject's own explanation, denial, or public statement exists on the record, it is represented alongside our findings. We do not publish a claim we know to be false.
Errors are corrected promptly and visibly, noted at the top of the affected investigation. We never silently edit published work.
We do not remove or alter reporting in response to threats — legal, financial, or personal. Evidence changes our coverage. Pressure does not.
Invoices, screenshots, internal decks, reseller price lists — documents drive our reporting. We accept tips securely and never publish a source's identity without consent.
Submit a Tip